On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 22:51:04 +0800, Luming Yu wrote: > >> > It didn't. It looks like it is unusable, becuase it isn't reliable in > >> > 2.6.20-rc3. > >> > >> Is this issue still present in -rc4? > > > >I used 2.6.20-rc4 in single user mode, and applied 2 patches from > >netdev to get wake on LAN support. This way I was able to set up an > >automatic suspend/resume loop. It looked good, but after e.g. 20 > >minutes, the resume hang. So it is reproduceable with 2.6.20-rc4. > >Unfortunately, I can not test the same with 2.6.18, as the wake on LAN > >patches need 2.6.20-rc. > > Hmm, do you mean this is the first time of this kind of testing? > Is this issue related to LAN driver? > I guess you should be able to set up an automatic suspend/resume loop > with /proc/acpi/alarm, and test similar with 2.6.18.
Thanks for the hint. I just used /proc/acpi/alarm to set up a suspend/resume loop and did ca. 100 cycles in a row with 2.6.18.2 in single user mode, without a failure. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
