On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:38:02 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:05:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:57:23 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:17:59PM +0800, Gang He wrote: > > > > Implement online file check sysfile interfaces, e.g. > > > > how to create the related sysfile according to device name, > > > > how to display/handle file check request from the sysfile. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gang He <g...@suse.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> > > > > Thanks. So all of > > > > ocfs2-export-ocfs2_kset-for-online-file-check.patch > > ocfs2-sysfile-interfaces-for-online-file-check.patch > > ocfs2-sysfile-interfaces-for-online-file-check-v4.patch > > ocfs2-create-remove-sysfile-for-online-file-check.patch > > ocfs2-check-fix-inode-block-for-online-file-check.patch > > ocfs2-check-fix-inode-block-for-online-file-check-v4.patch > > ocfs2-add-feature-document-for-online-file-check.patch > > > > have your reviewed-by. I'll send them on to Linus. > > I'm curious, are the '-V4' patches built on top of the non '-V4' versions? yes, the -v4 patches bring the base patch from whatever-version-i-originally-merged up to v4. > Otherwise though this generally sounds good to me - I have reviewed the > entire online fsck patch series. Cool.
