On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
>
> When firmware does not use _DSD properties that allow properly name GPIO
> resources, the kernel falls back on parsing _CRS resources, and will
> return entries described as GpioInt() as general purpose GPIOs even
> though they are meant to be used simply as interrupt sources for the
> device:

Patch applied for fixes. Is this a regression so that I should
also tag it for stable?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Reply via email to