On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> > > > > When firmware does not use _DSD properties that allow properly name GPIO > > resources, the kernel falls back on parsing _CRS resources, and will > > return entries described as GpioInt() as general purpose GPIOs even > > though they are meant to be used simply as interrupt sources for the > > device: > > Patch applied for fixes. Is this a regression so that I should > also tag it for stable?
No, I think it is OK to keep it in 4.6+. Thanks. -- Dmitry
