On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:57:05PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> From: Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com>
>
> In preparation for ACPI support, add a pmu_probe_info table to
> the arm_pmu_device_probe() call. This table gets used when
> probing in the absence of a devicetree node for PMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 10 +++++++++-
> include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index f419a7c..8f12eac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -867,9 +867,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> {},
> };
>
> +static const struct pmu_probe_info armv8_pmu_probe_table[] = {
> + ARMV8_PMU_PART_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A53, armv8_a53_pmu_init),
> + ARMV8_PMU_PART_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57, armv8_a57_pmu_init),
> + PMU_PROBE(0, 0, armv8_pmuv3_init), /* if all else fails... */
> + { /* sentinel value */ }
> +};
> +
Hi Jeremy,
with 4.6 ThunderX PMU support was added, so I think above table is
missing a line like:
ARMV8_PMU_PART_PROBE(CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX, armv8_thunder_pmu_init)
Thanks,
Jan
