On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:26:55AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:26:27AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > This needs to be after ops is fenced, something like this.
> >
> > I would appreciate a supporting argument.
> >
> > I guess the argument here is that this will prevent user space from
> > issuing TPM commands after the shutdown command has been sent?
>
> It prevents everything including the kernel from issuing a command
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That lock is not used to exclude kernel access. Read lock is only taken
for the user space device in tpm-dev.c.
> after shutdown. The shutdown is sent as the last command and no other
> commands can follow it.
>
> It doesn't make any sense to allow commands to follow shutdown.
I agree with this.
> Jason
/Jarkko
