On 04/18/2016 02:31 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
While playing with such statistics I ran into the following splat on a VM when opening pv_hash_hops:[ 25.267962] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP ... [ 25.268807] CPU: 17 PID: 1018 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.6.0-rc3-debug+ #2 [ 25.268853] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20151208_145348-sheep05 04/01/2014 [ 25.268930] task: ffff88029a10c040 ti: ffff8800b1e1c000 task.ti: ffff8800b1e1c000 [ 25.268979] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810b61fe>] [<ffffffff810b61fe>] qstat_read+0x12e/0x1e0 [ 25.269043] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b1e1fde8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 25.269081] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 25.269128] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff81911640 [ 25.269175] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 25.269223] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000df00 [ 25.269270] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8800b1e1ff28 [ 25.269319] FS: 00007f3bd2f88700(0000) GS:ffff8802b5240000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 25.269372] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 25.269411] CR2: 00007f3bd2ddc008 CR3: 000000002c5f0000 CR4: 00000000000406e0 [ 25.269467] Stack: [ 25.269487] 00007f3bd2ddd000 0000000000020000 ffffffff811cad7c ffffffff8119750c [ 25.269549] ffff88002d08e000 ffffea0000b07140 ffffea0000b07140 ffff88002d08e000 [ 25.269609] ffffffff8118d3b9 ffffffff811937a9 00000000102a46cb ffff8802992beb00 [ 25.269670] Call Trace: [ 25.269698] [<ffffffff811cad7c>] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x6c/0xd0 [ 25.269745] [<ffffffff8119750c>] ? page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x8c/0xd0 [ 25.269791] [<ffffffff8118d3b9>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x1439/0x1b40 [ 25.269834] [<ffffffff811937a9>] ? do_mmap+0x449/0x550 [ 25.269872] [<ffffffff811d3de3>] ? __vfs_read+0x23/0xd0 [ 25.270506] [<ffffffff811d4ab2>] ? rw_verify_area+0x52/0xd0 [ 25.271093] [<ffffffff811d4bb1>] ? vfs_read+0x81/0x120 [ 25.271677] [<ffffffff811d5f12>] ? SyS_read+0x42/0xa0 [ 25.272294] [<ffffffff815720f6>] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xa8 [ 25.272904] Code: 00 48 8b 74 24 50 65 48 33 34 25 28 00 00 00 0f 85 b7 00 00 00 48 83 c4 58 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 89 ee 4c 89 f0 31 d2<48> f7 f6 48 d1 ed 48 8d 5c 24 10 48 8d 3c 92 48 89 c1 31 d2 48 [ 25.274347] RIP [<ffffffff810b61fe>] qstat_read+0x12e/0x1e0 [ 25.274885] RSP<ffff8800b1e1fde8> [ 25.275457] ---[ end trace 8558569eb04480ab ]--- Fix this by verifying that qstat_pv_kick_unlock is in fact non-zero, similarly to what the qstat_pv_latency_wake case does, as if nothing else, this can come from resetting the statistics, thus having 0 kicks should be quite valid in this context. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso<dbu...@suse.de> --- kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h index eb2a2c9bc3fc..d734b7502001 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h @@ -136,10 +136,12 @@ static ssize_t qstat_read(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf, } if (counter == qstat_pv_hash_hops) { - u64 frac; + u64 frac = 0; - frac = 100ULL * do_div(stat, kicks); - frac = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(frac, kicks); + if (kicks) { + frac = 100ULL * do_div(stat, kicks); + frac = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(frac, kicks); + } /* * Return a X.XX decimal number
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <waiman.l...@hpe.com> Cheers, Longman
