On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 17:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 03:03:00PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > > @@ -729,6 +771,11 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) > > rapl_cntr_mask = RAPL_IDX_SRV; > > rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = > > rapl_events_srv_attr; > > break; > > + case 78: /* Skylake client */ > > + case 94: /* Skylake H/S */ > > + rapl_cntr_mask = RAPL_IDX_SKL_CLN; > > + rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = > > rapl_events_skl_attr; > > + break; > > case 87: /* Knights Landing */ > > apply_quirk = true; > > rapl_cntr_mask = RAPL_IDX_KNL; > Please post this against tip/perf/core, all this code got munged in > patch: > > 4b6e2571bf00 ("x86/perf/intel/rapl: Make the Intel RAPL PMU driver > modular") I will repost.
> > Also; what about 85 (skl-server)? I didn't get chance to test RAPL on SKL server. It should follow BDW server, but want to test before. Thanks, Srinivas > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" > in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html