On 04/24/2016 10:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:56:38PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 04/24/2016 02:31 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:14:24PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
I see the following log message when running a qemu test for 'beagle'
with omap2plus_defconfig.
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.6.0-rc4-next-20160422 #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/power.h:328 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
no locks held by swapper/0/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc4-next-20160422 #1
Hardware name: Generic OMAP3-GP (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c010f55c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b64c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010b64c>] (show_stack) from [<c047acbc>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xe0)
[<c047acbc>] (dump_stack) from [<c012bc10>] (pwrdm_set_next_pwrst+0xf8/0x1cc)
[<c012bc10>] (pwrdm_set_next_pwrst) from [<c01269fc>]
(omap3_enter_idle_bm+0x1b8/0x1e8)
[<c01269fc>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm) from [<c05fa0b8>]
(cpuidle_enter_state+0x84/0x408)
[<c05fa0b8>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0182c1c>]
(cpu_startup_entry+0x1c8/0x3f0)
[<c0182c1c>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0b00c20>] (start_kernel+0x354/0x3cc)
bisect points to commit 'rcu: Remove superfluous versions of
rcu_read_lock_sched_held()'. Bisect log is attached.
I believe that the real fix is not a revert of that commit, but rather
that some of the tracing statements need an "_rcuidle" suffix.
Something like the following (untested, probably does not build) patch.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit ca91304178e1cf53ee391236a0ac3969cc814e5f
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun Apr 24 14:30:16 2016 -0700
arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
index 78af6d8cf2e2..12b66b5bcc55 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
@@ -523,8 +523,8 @@ int pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u8
pwrst)
if (arch_pwrdm && arch_pwrdm->pwrdm_set_next_pwrst) {
/* Trace the pwrdm desired target state */
- trace_power_domain_target(pwrdm->name, pwrst,
- smp_processor_id());
+ trace_power_domain_target_rcuidle(pwrdm->name, pwrst,
+ smp_processor_id());
/* Program the pwrdm desired target state */
ret = arch_pwrdm->pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(pwrdm, pwrst);
}
It does build. After applying it, I get a different traceback.
[<c010f55c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b64c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010b64c>] (show_stack) from [<c047ac3c>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xe0)
[<c047ac3c>] (dump_stack) from [<c012c340>] (_pwrdm_state_switch+0x188/0x32c)
[<c012c340>] (_pwrdm_state_switch) from [<c012c4f0>]
(_pwrdm_post_transition_cb+0xc/0x14)
[<c012c4f0>] (_pwrdm_post_transition_cb) from [<c012ba74>]
(pwrdm_for_each+0x30/0x5c)
[<c012ba74>] (pwrdm_for_each) from [<c012c72c>]
(pwrdm_post_transition+0x24/0x30)
[<c012c72c>] (pwrdm_post_transition) from [<c012548c>]
(omap_sram_idle+0xfc/0x240)
[<c012548c>] (omap_sram_idle) from [<c0126934>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm+0xf0/0x1e8)
[<c0126934>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm) from [<c05fa038>]
(cpuidle_enter_state+0x84/0x408)
[<c05fa038>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0182b90>]
(cpu_startup_entry+0x1c8/0x3f0)
[<c0182b90>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0b00c20>] (start_kernel+0x354/0x3cc)
After making the same change in _pwrdm_state_switch(), the traceback is gone
from my tests (beagle, beagle-xm, and overo-tobi).
Very good!
(And yes, you normally find these one at a time...)
Are you going to submit a formal patch ?
Thanks,
Guenter
