* Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [160426 14:27]: > Done! These are at -rcu: > > 6eeec2b4a50c (arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle) > 0efee3da3b29 (arm: Use more _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle) > b6cdf6d22f52 (arm: Additional _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle) > 70da6fb7275b (arm: Whack another event-trace-from-idle mole) > 019db9102c6c (arm: Whack yet another event-trace-from-idle mole) > ebcd2861ae27 (arm: Whack an expected event-trace-from-idle mole) > > So how would you like these handled? I would be happy to send a fresh > patch series or git pull request if you would like to send them up your > tree, or I can send them up my usual path. Just let me know!
Probably best to keep them in your rcu tree, at least I'm not seeing any conflicts with my for-next with these. > And I would guess that other hardware and other configurations will > cause other moles to pop their heads up, but you never know. Heh yeah I'm sure we'll see some more :) Tony
