On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:36:46 +0800 "Ming Li" <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi, i`m sorry, I made some mistakes in last email. I have been studying mm > and learn age_activate_anon(), at the very beginning I felt confuse when I > saw activate_page_pvecs, after I learned the whole thing I understood that > it's similar with other pagevec's function. Can we put it with other pagevec > together? I think it is easier for newbies to read and understand. Welcome to kernel development ;) Your email client is mangling the patches in several ways. Please sort that out for next time - mail yourself a patch, check that it applies. The changelog text wasn't very conventional. I rewrote it to : Put the activate_page_pvecs definition next to those of the other : pagevecs, for clarity. and I changed the title to Subject: mm/swap.c: put activate_page_pvecs and other pagevecs together because "mm" is a big place!
