On Wednesday 27 April 2016 17:58:06 Sagar Dharia wrote: > + ctrl->tx.base = dma_alloc_coherent(ctrl->dev.parent, > + (ctrl->tx.sl_sz * ctrl->tx.n), > + &ctrl->tx.phy, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ctrl->tx.base) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto tx_alloc_failed; > + }
This looks controller specific, and hints that some parts of the "common" framework should actually be part of the controller driver instead. In particular, the use of "ctrl->dev.parent" suggests that this should have been allocated by the controller. > @@ -162,6 +279,15 @@ struct slim_controller { > struct slim_addrt *addrt; > u8 num_dev; > struct workqueue_struct *wq; > + struct slim_val_inf *tid_tbl[SLIM_MAX_TIDS]; > + u8 last_tid; > + spinlock_t txn_lock; > + struct slim_ctrl_buf tx; > + struct slim_ctrl_buf rx; > + struct slim_pending *pending_wr; > + struct semaphore tx_sem; Please try to avoid the use of semaphores in new code. Arnd