Using regmap_read_bulk is wrong because it assumes that a range of registers is being read. In our case reading from the fifo register will return multiple values but this is *not* auto-increment.
This currently works by accident. Signed-off-by: Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.cres...@intel.com> --- There is a need to determine if the underlying device is I2C or SPI here and the current solution is not terribly pretty. Perhaps the i2c_client/spi_device should be stored in inv_mpu6050_state instead? I ran into this issue while attempting to enable regmap caching but perhaps it could also be exposed by unusual i2c adapter capabilities? drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c index d070062..8455af0 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kfifo.h> #include <linux/poll.h> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> #include "inv_mpu_iio.h" static void inv_clear_kfifo(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st) @@ -128,6 +129,13 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p) u16 fifo_count; s64 timestamp; + struct device *regmap_dev = regmap_get_device(st->map); + struct i2c_client *i2c; + struct spi_device *spi = NULL; + + i2c = i2c_verify_client(regmap_dev); + spi = i2c ? NULL: to_spi_device(regmap_dev); + mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock); if (!(st->chip_config.accl_fifo_enable | st->chip_config.gyro_fifo_enable)) @@ -160,10 +168,27 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p) fifo_count / bytes_per_datum + INV_MPU6050_TIME_STAMP_TOR) goto flush_fifo; while (fifo_count >= bytes_per_datum) { - result = regmap_bulk_read(st->map, st->reg->fifo_r_w, - data, bytes_per_datum); - if (result) - goto flush_fifo; + /* + * We need to do a large burst read from a single register. + * + * regmap_read_bulk assumes that multiple registers are + * involved but in our case st->reg->fifo_r_w + 1 is something + * completely unrelated. + */ + if (spi) { + u8 cmd = st->reg->fifo_r_w | 0x80; + result = spi_write_then_read(spi, + &cmd, 1, + data, bytes_per_datum); + if (result) + goto flush_fifo; + } else { + result = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(i2c, + st->reg->fifo_r_w, + bytes_per_datum, data); + if (result != bytes_per_datum) + goto flush_fifo; + } result = kfifo_out(&st->timestamps, ×tamp, 1); /* when there is no timestamp, put timestamp as 0 */ -- 2.5.5