Hi Lee,

On Thursday 28 April 2016 03:28 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
MAXIM Semiconductor's PMIC, MAX77620/MAX20024 has 8 GPIO pins
which also act as the special function in alternate mode. Also
there is configuration like push-pull, open drain, FPS timing
etc for these pins.

Add pin control driver to configure these parameters through
pin control APIs.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

It seems there is some mismatches on kernel-next and the mfd/for-next for one of patch for generic function name.

/**
2016-04-01 pinctrl: Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map Irina Tirdea 1 -1/+1

d32f7fd3bbc32732b094d938b95169521503a9fb (patch)

pinctrl: Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map

Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map, since
it does not depend on device tree despite the current name. This
will enforce a consistent naming in pinctr-utils.c and will make
it clear it can be called from outside device tree (e.g. from
ACPI handling code).
**/

But this is not there in MFD sub system.

In mfd tree
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map,

In kernel next
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,


 I used APIs from the kernel-next.
+static const struct pinctrl_ops max77620_pinctrl_ops = {
+       .get_groups_count = max77620_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+       .get_group_name = max77620_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+       .get_group_pins = max77620_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+       .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+       .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};


If you see any issue on this patch, please drop this patch and we will fix this later once the renamed change available all the places.

Reply via email to