* Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've heard through the grapevine that there's some concern that we
> should not be bothering to enable XSAVES because there's not a
> sufficient use case for it. [...]
So I have no fundamental objections against this series - I didn't apply it
back
in March because not all patches had your Reviewed-by tag. Basically after you
sorted out all the XSAVE dynamic feature detection/sizing issues I was a happy
camper and have no objection against XSAVES.
Could you please send a refreshed version against the latestest tip:master?
Thanks,
Ingo
