On 2016-04-12 03:15:44, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> In LSMs such as SELinux, files can be associated with state from the
> credentials of the task that opens it. Since ecryptfs shares a single
> handle to lower files across tasks that access it, others tasks can
> later be denied access to the lower file as a result.
> 
> This change removes the kthread and unconditionally opens lower files
> with kernel service credentials. Under SELinux, users will need to allow
> the FD__USE permissions on the kernel context to process that need to
> access files on an ecryptfs filesystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou <ric...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  fs/ecryptfs/Makefile          |   2 +-
>  fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h |   4 -
>  fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c         | 172 
> ------------------------------------------
>  fs/ecryptfs/main.c            |  78 +++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/Makefile b/fs/ecryptfs/Makefile
> index 49678a6..f0bcf51 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ECRYPT_FS) += ecryptfs.o
>  
>  ecryptfs-y := dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o mmap.o read_write.o \
> -           crypto.o keystore.o kthread.o debug.o
> +           crypto.o keystore.o debug.o
>  
>  ecryptfs-$(CONFIG_ECRYPT_FS_MESSAGING) += messaging.o miscdev.o
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h b/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h
> index d123fba..6434736 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h
> @@ -695,10 +695,6 @@ int ecryptfs_find_daemon_by_euid(struct ecryptfs_daemon 
> **daemon);
>  #endif
>  int ecryptfs_init_kthread(void);
>  void ecryptfs_destroy_kthread(void);

The ecryptfs_{init,destroy}_kthread() declarations also need to be
removed.

> -int ecryptfs_privileged_open(struct file **lower_file,
> -                          struct dentry *lower_dentry,
> -                          struct vfsmount *lower_mnt,
> -                          const struct cred *cred);
>  int ecryptfs_get_lower_file(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode);
>  void ecryptfs_put_lower_file(struct inode *inode);
>  int
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c b/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 866bb18..0000000
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,172 +0,0 @@
> -/**
> - * eCryptfs: Linux filesystem encryption layer
> - *
> - * Copyright (C) 2008 International Business Machines Corp.
> - *   Author(s): Michael A. Halcrow <mahal...@us.ibm.com>
> - *
> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> - * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> - * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
> - * License, or (at your option) any later version.
> - *
> - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> - * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> - * General Public License for more details.
> - *
> - * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> - * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> - * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
> - * 02111-1307, USA.
> - */
> -
> -#include <linux/kthread.h>
> -#include <linux/freezer.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/wait.h>
> -#include <linux/mount.h>
> -#include "ecryptfs_kernel.h"
> -
> -struct ecryptfs_open_req {
> -     struct file **lower_file;
> -     struct path path;
> -     struct completion done;
> -     struct list_head kthread_ctl_list;
> -};
> -
> -static struct ecryptfs_kthread_ctl {
> -#define ECRYPTFS_KTHREAD_ZOMBIE 0x00000001
> -     u32 flags;
> -     struct mutex mux;
> -     struct list_head req_list;
> -     wait_queue_head_t wait;
> -} ecryptfs_kthread_ctl;
> -
> -static struct task_struct *ecryptfs_kthread;
> -
> -/**
> - * ecryptfs_threadfn
> - * @ignored: ignored
> - *
> - * The eCryptfs kernel thread that has the responsibility of getting
> - * the lower file with RW permissions.
> - *
> - * Returns zero on success; non-zero otherwise
> - */
> -static int ecryptfs_threadfn(void *ignored)
> -{
> -     set_freezable();
> -     while (1)  {
> -             struct ecryptfs_open_req *req;
> -
> -             wait_event_freezable(
> -                     ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.wait,
> -                     (!list_empty(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list)
> -                      || kthread_should_stop()));
> -             mutex_lock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -             if (ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.flags & ECRYPTFS_KTHREAD_ZOMBIE) {
> -                     mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -                     goto out;
> -             }
> -             while (!list_empty(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list)) {
> -                     req = list_first_entry(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list,
> -                                            struct ecryptfs_open_req,
> -                                            kthread_ctl_list);
> -                     list_del(&req->kthread_ctl_list);
> -                     *req->lower_file = dentry_open(&req->path,
> -                             (O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE), current_cred());
> -                     complete(&req->done);
> -             }
> -             mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -     }
> -out:
> -     return 0;
> -}
> -
> -int __init ecryptfs_init_kthread(void)
> -{
> -     int rc = 0;
> -
> -     mutex_init(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -     init_waitqueue_head(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.wait);
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list);
> -     ecryptfs_kthread = kthread_run(&ecryptfs_threadfn, NULL,
> -                                    "ecryptfs-kthread");
> -     if (IS_ERR(ecryptfs_kthread)) {
> -             rc = PTR_ERR(ecryptfs_kthread);
> -             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failed to create kernel thread; rc = [%d]"
> -                    "\n", __func__, rc);
> -     }
> -     return rc;
> -}
> -
> -void ecryptfs_destroy_kthread(void)
> -{
> -     struct ecryptfs_open_req *req, *tmp;
> -
> -     mutex_lock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -     ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.flags |= ECRYPTFS_KTHREAD_ZOMBIE;
> -     list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list,
> -                              kthread_ctl_list) {
> -             list_del(&req->kthread_ctl_list);
> -             *req->lower_file = ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> -             complete(&req->done);
> -     }
> -     mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -     kthread_stop(ecryptfs_kthread);
> -     wake_up(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.wait);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * ecryptfs_privileged_open
> - * @lower_file: Result of dentry_open by root on lower dentry
> - * @lower_dentry: Lower dentry for file to open
> - * @lower_mnt: Lower vfsmount for file to open
> - *
> - * This function gets a r/w file opened againt the lower dentry.
> - *
> - * Returns zero on success; non-zero otherwise
> - */
> -int ecryptfs_privileged_open(struct file **lower_file,
> -                          struct dentry *lower_dentry,
> -                          struct vfsmount *lower_mnt,
> -                          const struct cred *cred)
> -{
> -     struct ecryptfs_open_req req;
> -     int flags = O_LARGEFILE;
> -     int rc = 0;
> -
> -     init_completion(&req.done);
> -     req.lower_file = lower_file;
> -     req.path.dentry = lower_dentry;
> -     req.path.mnt = lower_mnt;
> -
> -     /* Corresponding dput() and mntput() are done when the
> -      * lower file is fput() when all eCryptfs files for the inode are
> -      * released. */
> -     flags |= IS_RDONLY(d_inode(lower_dentry)) ? O_RDONLY : O_RDWR;
> -     (*lower_file) = dentry_open(&req.path, flags, cred);
> -     if (!IS_ERR(*lower_file))
> -             goto out;
> -     if ((flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY) {
> -             rc = PTR_ERR((*lower_file));
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -     mutex_lock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -     if (ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.flags & ECRYPTFS_KTHREAD_ZOMBIE) {
> -             rc = -EIO;
> -             mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: We are in the middle of shutting down; "
> -                    "aborting privileged request to open lower file\n",
> -                     __func__);
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -     list_add_tail(&req.kthread_ctl_list, &ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list);
> -     mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
> -     wake_up(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.wait);
> -     wait_for_completion(&req.done);
> -     if (IS_ERR(*lower_file))
> -             rc = PTR_ERR(*lower_file);
> -out:
> -     return rc;
> -}
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> index 1698132..9459fbb 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>   * 02111-1307, USA.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/cred.h>
>  #include <linux/dcache.h>
>  #include <linux/file.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -95,6 +96,56 @@ void __ecryptfs_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * Credentials for opening lower files.
> + */
> +static const struct cred *kernel_cred;
> +
> +/**
> + * ecryptfs_privileged_open
> + * @lower_file: Result of dentry_open by root on lower dentry
> + * @lower_dentry: Lower dentry for file to open
> + * @lower_mnt: Lower vfsmount for file to open
> + *
> + * This function gets a r/w file opened againt the lower dentry.

s/againt/against/

> + *
> + * Returns zero on success; non-zero otherwise
> + */
> +static int ecryptfs_privileged_open(struct file **lower_file,
> +                                 struct dentry *lower_dentry,
> +                                 struct vfsmount *lower_mnt)
> +{
> +     struct path path;
> +     int flags = O_LARGEFILE;
> +     int rc = 0;
> +     const struct cred *old_cred;
> +
> +     path.dentry = lower_dentry;
> +     path.mnt = lower_mnt;
> +     flags |= IS_RDONLY(d_inode(lower_dentry)) ? O_RDONLY : O_RDWR;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Use kernel service credentials to open the lower file, as the current
> +      * task may not have write privileges.  Uses kernel creds instead of
> +      * normal creds with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE because because some LSMs like
> +      * SELinux associate the file with extra state from the current
> +      * credentials. When this happens, access to the lower file can
> +      * be affected by which task was the first to open it.
> +      */
> +     old_cred = override_creds(kernel_cred);

Do you know if we have to call override_creds() here or can we simply
pass kernel_cred to dentry_open()?

The LSMs would get kernel_cred passed to their file_open hook but I'm
wondering if we could potentially hit an issue where we don't have
enough privs when calling into a filesystem's d_op->d_select_inode() or
f_op->open().

> +
> +     /* Corresponding dput() and mntput() are done when the
> +      * lower file is fput() when all eCryptfs files for the inode are
> +      * released. */
> +     (*lower_file) = dentry_open(&path, flags, kernel_cred);
> +
> +     revert_creds(old_cred);
> +
> +     if (IS_ERR(*lower_file))
> +             rc = PTR_ERR(*lower_file);
> +     return rc;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * ecryptfs_init_lower_file
>   * @ecryptfs_dentry: Fully initialized eCryptfs dentry object, with
>   *                   the lower dentry and the lower mount set
> @@ -118,12 +169,10 @@ void __ecryptfs_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
>  static int ecryptfs_init_lower_file(struct dentry *dentry,
>                                   struct file **lower_file)
>  {
> -     const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
>       struct path *path = ecryptfs_dentry_to_lower_path(dentry);
>       int rc;
>  
> -     rc = ecryptfs_privileged_open(lower_file, path->dentry, path->mnt,
> -                                   cred);
> +     rc = ecryptfs_privileged_open(lower_file, path->dentry, path->mnt);
>       if (rc) {
>               printk(KERN_ERR "Error opening lower file "
>                      "for lower_dentry [0x%p] and lower_mnt [0x%p]; "
> @@ -829,29 +878,30 @@ static int __init ecryptfs_init(void)
>                               (unsigned long)PAGE_SIZE);
>               goto out;
>       }
> +     kernel_cred = prepare_kernel_cred(NULL);

I see the prepare_kernel_cred(NULL) results in the capabilities being
set to CAP_FULL_SET. I don't love the thought of that because I don't
think it is necessary. To reduce the potential for mistakes/abuse, I'd
like to see us use a kernel cred that has the bare minimum set of caps
that is needed to perform this dentry_open().


I think we're getting close to landing on a final patch. Thanks for
being patient with my slow review turnarounds. Things have been busy
with the Ubuntu 16.04 release.

Tyler

> +     if (kernel_cred == NULL) {
> +             rc = -ENOMEM;
> +             ecryptfs_printk(KERN_ERR,
> +                             "Failed to prepare kernel credentials\n");
> +             goto out;
> +     }
>       rc = ecryptfs_init_kmem_caches();
>       if (rc) {
>               printk(KERN_ERR
>                      "Failed to allocate one or more kmem_cache objects\n");
> -             goto out;
> +             goto out_put_cred;
>       }
>       rc = do_sysfs_registration();
>       if (rc) {
>               printk(KERN_ERR "sysfs registration failed\n");
>               goto out_free_kmem_caches;
>       }
> -     rc = ecryptfs_init_kthread();
> -     if (rc) {
> -             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: kthread initialization failed; "
> -                    "rc = [%d]\n", __func__, rc);
> -             goto out_do_sysfs_unregistration;
> -     }
>       rc = ecryptfs_init_messaging();
>       if (rc) {
>               printk(KERN_ERR "Failure occurred while attempting to "
>                               "initialize the communications channel to "
>                               "ecryptfsd\n");
> -             goto out_destroy_kthread;
> +             goto out_do_sysfs_unregistration;
>       }
>       rc = ecryptfs_init_crypto();
>       if (rc) {
> @@ -873,12 +923,12 @@ out_destroy_crypto:
>       ecryptfs_destroy_crypto();
>  out_release_messaging:
>       ecryptfs_release_messaging();
> -out_destroy_kthread:
> -     ecryptfs_destroy_kthread();
>  out_do_sysfs_unregistration:
>       do_sysfs_unregistration();
>  out_free_kmem_caches:
>       ecryptfs_free_kmem_caches();
> +out_put_cred:
> +     put_cred(kernel_cred);
>  out:
>       return rc;
>  }
> @@ -892,10 +942,10 @@ static void __exit ecryptfs_exit(void)
>               printk(KERN_ERR "Failure whilst attempting to destroy crypto; "
>                      "rc = [%d]\n", rc);
>       ecryptfs_release_messaging();
> -     ecryptfs_destroy_kthread();
>       do_sysfs_unregistration();
>       unregister_filesystem(&ecryptfs_fs_type);
>       ecryptfs_free_kmem_caches();
> +     put_cred(kernel_cred);
>  }
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Michael A. Halcrow <mhalc...@us.ibm.com>");
> -- 
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to