On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:39:35PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/27/2016 07:11 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > >6. Perhaps don't use the LRU pagevecs for large pages. It limits the > > severity of the problem. > > I think that makes sense. Being large already amortizes the cost per base > page much more than pagevecs do (512 vs ~22 pages?).
We try to do this already, don't we? Any spefic case where we have THPs on pagevecs? -- Kirill A. Shutemov
