The newly added sun4i drm driver prints a dma address using the %x
format string, which cannot work when dma_addr_t is 64 bit,
and gcc warns about this configuration:

drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c: In function 'sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer':
drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c:193:84: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 
'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned 
int}' [-Werror=format=]
  DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Using GEM @ 0x%x\n", gem->paddr);
drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c:201:84: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 
'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned 
int}' [-Werror=format=]
  DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Setting buffer address to 0x%x\n", paddr);

This changes the code to use the explicit %pad format string, which
always prints the right length.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
index f7a15c1a93bf..3ab560450a82 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer(struct sun4i_backend 
*backend,
        /* Get the physical address of the buffer in memory */
        gem = drm_fb_cma_get_gem_obj(fb, 0);
 
-       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Using GEM @ 0x%x\n", gem->paddr);
+       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Using GEM @ %pad\n", &gem->paddr);
 
        /* Compute the start of the displayed memory */
        bpp = drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0);
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer(struct sun4i_backend 
*backend,
        paddr += (state->src_x >> 16) * bpp;
        paddr += (state->src_y >> 16) * fb->pitches[0];
 
-       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Setting buffer address to 0x%x\n", paddr);
+       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Setting buffer address to %pad\n", &paddr);
 
        /* Write the 32 lower bits of the address (in bits) */
        lo_paddr = paddr << 3;
-- 
2.7.0

Reply via email to