On 1/23/07 9:57 AM, "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Definitely disagree with that. I'd like to see the conference somewhere >> else different this time - perhaps Czech Republic, or somewhere else more >> easterly and Linux active (or even Finland...) > > This is my position as well. > > If the kernel summit is important enough, all the bean counters will > find a way to get their constituents to the event, it's as simple as > that.
Actually, it isn't. Within the Northern Hemisphere and with locations that are reasonably cheaply to reach from most of Europe and North America, yes, at the end of the day people will be able to come. We seem to have two different types of motivation for proposed locations in this discussion. Some of us are looking for a convenient location. Some of us are proposing locations as a political statement. I believe the latter isn't a good idea. The kernel summit is by invitation only. It therefore is a very bad forum to bring Linux to a place. Add to that that locations like Brazil or India will add thousands of dollars of cost per person and add much more problems with jet lag for many people I think they'll be very hard to justify. > For the first time in many years I'm strongly considering actually > going to the kernel summit, however if it goes back to Ottawa I > definitely will stop going again. Is that specific to Ottawa, or is this any North American location? I strongly believe that it's a good idea to alternate between locations in North America and Europe. That's were most of the attendees live. Just as it was a bad idea to keep it in North America all the time, it would be a bad idea to keep it in Europe. /D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
