On 2016/5/12 5:40, Douglas Anderson wrote:
Historically for Rockchip devices we've relied on the power-on
default (or perhaps the firmware setting) to get the correct drive
phase for dw_mmc devices.  This worked OK for the most part, but:

* Relying on the setting just "being right" is a bit fragile.

* As soon as there is an instance where the power on default is wrong or
  where the firmware didn't configure this properly then we'll get a
  mysterious failure.

Let's explicitly set this phase in the kernel.

The comments inside this patch try to explain the situation quite
throughly, but the high level overview of this is:

Before this patch on rk3288 devices tested:
* eMMC: 180 degrees
* SDMMC/SDIO0/SDIO1: 90 degrees

After this patch:
* Use 90 degree phase offset usually.
* Use 180 degree phase offset for MMC_DDR52, SDR104, HS200.

Thanks for doing this.

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin<shawn....@rock-chips.com>


That means we are _changing_ behavior for those devices in this way:

* If we have HS200 eMMC or DDR52 eMMC, we'll run ID mode at 90
  degrees (vs 180) but otherwise have no change.

* For any non-HS200 / non-DDR52 eMMC devices we'll now _always_ run at
  90 degrees (vs 180).  It seems fairly unlikely that building modern
  hardware is using an eMMC that isn't using DDR52 or HS200, of course.

* For SDR104 cards we'll now run with 180 degree phase offset (vs 90).
  It's expected that 90 degree phase offset would have worked OK, but
  this gives us extra margin.

I have tested this by inserting my collection of uSD cards (mostly UHS,
though a few not) into a veyron_minnie and confirmed that they still
seem to enumerate properly.  For a subset of them I tried putting a
filesystem on them and also tried running mmc_test.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Now use 90 degrees for some modes; updated comments to say why.

 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c 
b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
index 8c20b81cafd8..8068fa887db8 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
@@ -66,6 +66,70 @@ static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, 
struct mmc_ios *ios)
        /* Make sure we use phases which we can enumerate with */
        if (!IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk))
                clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, priv->default_sample_phase);
+
+       /*
+        * Set the drive phase offset based on speed mode to achieve hold times.
+        *
+        * That this is _not_ a value that is dynamically tuned and is also
+        * _not_ a value that will vary from board to board.  It is a value
+        * that could vary between different SoC models if they had massively
+        * different output clock delays inside their dw_mmc IP block (delay_o),
+        * but since it's OK to overshoot a little we don't need to do complex
+        * calculations and can pick values that will just work for everyone.
+        *
+        * When picking values we'll stick with picking 0/90/180/270 since
+        * those can be made very accurately on all known Rockchip SoCs.
+        *
+        * Note that these values match values from the DesignWare Databook
+        * tables for the most part except for SDR12 and "ID mode".  For those
+        * two modes the databook calculations assume a clock in of 50MHz.  As
+        * seen above, we always use a clock in rate that is exactly the
+        * card's input clock (times RK3288_CLKGEN_DIV, but that gets divided
+        * back out before the controller sees it).
+        *
+        * From measurement of a single device, it appears that delay_o is
+        * about .5 ns.  Since we try to leave a bit of margin, it's expected
+        * that numbers here will be fine even with much larger delay_o
+        * (the 1.4 ns assumed by the DesignWare Databook would result in the
+        * same results, for instance).
+        */
+       if (!IS_ERR(priv->drv_clk)) {
+               int phase;
+
+               /*
+                * In almost all cases a 90 degree phase offset will provide
+                * sufficient hold times across all valid input clock rates
+                * assuming delay_o is not absurd for a given SoC.  We'll use
+                * that as a default.
+                */
+               phase = 90;
+
+               switch (ios->timing) {
+               case MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52:
+                       /*
+                        * Since clock in rate with MMC_DDR52 is doubled when
+                        * bus width is 8 we need to double the phase offset
+                        * to get the same timings.
+                        */
+                       if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8)
+                               phase = 180;
+                       break;
+               case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104:
+               case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200:
+                       /*
+                        * In the case of 150 MHz clock (typical max for
+                        * Rockchip SoCs), 90 degree offset will add a delay
+                        * of 1.67 ns.  That will meet min hold time of .8 ns
+                        * as long as clock output delay is < .87 ns.  On
+                        * SoCs measured this seems to be OK, but it doesn't
+                        * hurt to give margin here, so we use 180.
+                        */
+                       phase = 180;
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               clk_set_phase(priv->drv_clk, phase);
+       }
 }

 #define NUM_PHASES                     360



--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Reply via email to