Hi David,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> writes:
> Now that the bridge code defers the switchdev port state setting, there
> is no need to defer the port STP state change within the mv88e6xxx code.
> Thus get rid of the driver's bridge work code.
>
> This also fixes a race condition where the DSA layer assumes that the
> bridge code already set the unbridged port's STP state to Disabled
> before restoring the Forwarding state.
>
> As a consequence, this also fixes the FDB flush for the unbridged port
> which now correctly occurs during the Forwarding to Disabled transition.
>
> Fixes: 0bc05d585d38 ("switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set
> as deferred")
> Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com>
This patch doesn't apply to -net, only applies to net-next...
How should I handle that, do I resend a patch for net-next with the good
subject prefix, and a v2 for -net?
Sorry for the noise,
Vivien
