* Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 17/05/16 11:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Sat, 14 May 2016, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> Please pull the following branch which contains support for Xen on ARM
> > >> EFI platforms.
> > >>
> > >> This merge includes a merge of Stefano's xen/linux-next branch to pull
> > >> in the prerequisites required for Shannon's commit:
> > >>
> > >> 11ee5491e5ff ("Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI")
> > >>
> > >> as it needs both the latest changes in the EFI 'next' branch (now
> > >> tip/efi/core) and xen/linux-next.
> > >>
> > >> I have intentionally not included the individual patches as I would
> > >> normally do in a pull request, so that commit history created by my
> > >> merging of Stefano's branch is preserved, and so that there's no way
> > >> to accidentally apply the patches individually.
> > >>
> > >> The following changes since commit
> > >> 6c5450ef66816216e574885cf8d3ddb31ef77428:
> > >>
> > >> efivarfs: Make efivarfs_file_ioctl() static (2016-05-07 07:06:13 +0200)
> > >>
> > >> are available in the git repository at:
> > >>
> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git
> > >> efi/arm-xen
> > >>
> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 11ee5491e5ff519e0d3a7018eb21351cb6955a98:
> > >>
> > >> Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI (2016-05-14
> > >> 19:31:01 +0100)
> > >
> > > Is this arrangement working for everybody, in particular the tip
> > > maintainers?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I meant the x86 tip maintainers (Thomas, Peter and Ingo).
I have no particular objections, since this seems to be Xen-next merged to the
EFI
tree that is already upstream, plus this single commit on top of t:
11ee5491e5ff Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI
Which, if Matt is fine with it, you could send to Linus too as part of this
cycle's Xen pull request.
Thanks,
Ingo
