The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
mmc_request like the on-going cmd and the corresponding sbc
if the card is removed. Although we have already checked this in
dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and dw_mci_init_slot
for noremovable devices, but there is a timing gap before it really
calls dw_mci_get_cd as mmc_detect_change needs some delay here.

Another gain here is that we could save some checkings of card status
after sd card been removed.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn....@rock-chips.com>
---

 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index cb30e91..8eb7898 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
 static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
 static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
 static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
+static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
 static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
@@ -1255,7 +1256,7 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct 
mmc_request *mrq)
         */
        spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
 
-       if (!test_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags)) {
+       if (!dw_mci_get_cd(mmc)) {
                spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
                mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
                mmc_request_done(mmc, mrq);
-- 
2.3.7


Reply via email to