On 05/31, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:38:54 PM CEST Roman Volkov wrote: > > > > Arnd, your version is fine for me. We may apply it instead. > > > > As you can see, I attached another patch where the logic for WM8650 is > > completely reworked. This patch also removes the warning, that is why > > fixing the wm8650 function is not necessary. > > > > What about the WM8650 enhancement? Can I apply it on top of your > > changes? > > I think the easiest way is if you pick up my patch and submit it together > with your other patch as a series (keeping my From: line and adding your > Signed-off-by: below mine). > > My patch should probably go first so we can get it into linux-4.7, while > I assume your other one is for 4.8? If we want both in 4.7, either order > is fine. >
Yes please do this, but we'll just merge both for v4.8. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
