On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Jungseung Lee wrote: > posix_clock_compat_ioctl() is identical to posix_clock_ioctl(). > We don't need additional compat_ioctl in this time. > Remove posix_clock_compat_ioctl() and let posix_clock_ioctl() is in charge.
Which will return -ENOTTY for all affected ioctls simply because the ioctls
are not listed in the compatible list.
Thanks,
tglx

