On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Jungseung Lee wrote:

> posix_clock_compat_ioctl() is identical to posix_clock_ioctl().
> We don't need additional compat_ioctl in this time.
> Remove posix_clock_compat_ioctl() and let posix_clock_ioctl() is in charge.

Which will return -ENOTTY for all affected ioctls simply because the ioctls
are not listed in the compatible list.

Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to