On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com> wrote: > 1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not > been initialized. > 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0.
even smp init assumes cpu0/boot processor. is this patch tested on any hardware? can you describe your testing hardware? > > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com> > --- > arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 8 -------- > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > index d73b0a0..92b1692 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu) > */ > static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) > { > - unsigned int cpu; > int node; > > /* setup nr_node_ids if not done yet */ > @@ -106,9 +105,6 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) > cpumask_clear(node_to_cpumask_map[node]); > } > > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) > - set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE); > - do you see this init of setting node id to NUMA_NO_NODE for each cpu happening any where else? otherwise, better to have initialised node id/NUMA_NO_NODE to every cpu otherwise default node id will be shown as zero which is not correct. > /* cpumask_of_node() will now work */ > pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids); > } > @@ -379,10 +375,6 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) > > setup_node_to_cpumask_map(); > > - /* init boot processor */ > - cpu_to_node_map[0] = 0; > - map_cpu_to_node(0, 0); > - otherwise, how you set numa info for cpu0/boot-processor? thanks Ganapat > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.5.0 > > > thanks ganapat > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel