On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 21:54 +0800, Su Xuemin wrote:
> From: "Su, Xuemin" <s...@chinanetcenter.com>
>
> There is a corner case in which udp packets belonging to a same
> flow are hashed to different socket when hslot->count changes from 10
> to 11:
>
> 1) When hslot->count <= 10, __udp_lib_lookup() searches udp_table->hash,
> and always passes 'daddr' to udp_ehashfn().
>
> 2) When hslot->count > 10, __udp_lib_lookup() searches udp_table->hash2,
> but may pass 'INADDR_ANY' to udp_ehashfn() if the sockets are bound to
> INADDR_ANY instead of some specific addr.
>
> That means when hslot->count changes from 10 to 11, the hash calculated by
> udp_ehashfn() is also changed, and the udp packets belonging to a same
> flow will be hashed to different socket.
>
> This is easily reproduced:
> 1) Create 10 udp sockets and bind all of them to 0.0.0.0:40000.
> 2) From the same host send udp packets to 127.0.0.1:40000, record the
> socket index which receives the packets.
> 3) Create 1 more udp socket and bind it to 0.0.0.0:44096. The number 44096
> is 40000 + UDP_HASH_SIZE(4096), this makes the new socket put into the
> same hslot as the aformentioned 10 sockets, and makes the hslot->count
> change from 10 to 11.
> 4) From the same host send udp packets to 127.0.0.1:40000, and the socket
> index which receives the packets will be different from the one received
> in step 2.
> This should not happen as the socket bound to 0.0.0.0:44096 should not
> change the behavior of the sockets bound to 0.0.0.0:40000.
>
> The fix here is that when searching udp_table->hash, if the socket
> supports reuseport, pass inet_sk(sk)->inet_rcv_saddr to udp_ehashfn()
> instead of daddr. When the sockets are bound to some specific addr,
> inet_sk(sk)->inet_rcv_saddr should equal to daddr, and when the sockets
> are bould to INADDR_ANY, this will pass INADDR_ANY to udp_ehashfn() as
> what is done when searching udp_table->hash2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su, Xuemin <s...@chinanetcenter.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index d56c055..57c38f6 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -577,7 +577,9 @@ begin:
> if (score > badness) {
> reuseport = sk->sk_reuseport;
> if (reuseport) {
> - hash = udp_ehashfn(net, daddr, hnum,
> + hash = udp_ehashfn(net,
> + inet_sk(sk)->inet_rcv_saddr,
> + hnum,
> saddr, sport);
> result = reuseport_select_sock(sk, hash, skb,
> sizeof(struct udphdr));
Hi, thanks for the report and patch.
But it is not clear on which tree you base it.
What about IPv6. No bug there ?
