On 06/08/2016 08:30 PM, Matthew Leach wrote: > Use the byte-order aware big endian accessors, allowing for kernels > running under big-endian. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Leach <matt...@mattleach.net> > --- > CC: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > CC: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net> > CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> > CC: Kukjin Kim <kg...@kernel.org> > CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > CC: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c > b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c > index ead15be..b78a169 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c > @@ -55,14 +55,14 @@ static void combiner_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data) > { > u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32); > > - __raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR); > + writel_relaxed(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR); > } > > static void combiner_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data) > { > u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32); > > - __raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET); > + writel_relaxed(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET); > } > > static void combiner_handle_cascade_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void combiner_handle_cascade_irq(struct irq_desc > *desc) > chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > > spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock); > - status = __raw_readl(chip_data->base + COMBINER_INT_STATUS); > + status = readl_relaxed(chip_data->base + COMBINER_INT_STATUS); > spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); > status &= chip_data->irq_mask; > > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void __init combiner_init_one(struct > combiner_chip_data *combiner_data, > combiner_data->parent_irq = irq; > > /* Disable all interrupts */ > - __raw_writel(combiner_data->irq_mask, base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR); > + writel_relaxed(combiner_data->irq_mask, base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR); > } > > static int combiner_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d, > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int combiner_suspend(void) > > for (i = 0; i < max_nr; i++) > combiner_data[i].pm_save = > - __raw_readl(combiner_data[i].base + > COMBINER_ENABLE_SET); > + readl_relaxed(combiner_data[i].base + > COMBINER_ENABLE_SET); > > return 0; > } > @@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ static void combiner_resume(void) > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < max_nr; i++) { > - __raw_writel(combiner_data[i].irq_mask, > + writel_relaxed(combiner_data[i].irq_mask, > combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR); > - __raw_writel(combiner_data[i].pm_save, > + writel_relaxed(combiner_data[i].pm_save, > combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
Indentation of arguments is broken. I think it was aligned before. Beside that: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> Best regards, Krzysztof