On 06/15/2016 04:25 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15 2016, Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> At some point I was 100% sure this worked. I do remember testing it against >> just a loadable module and had positive testing results. > > I think the current %ps/%pf behaviour was introduced in 4796dd200db9 > (way back in 2012).
Yeah, I'm scratching my head on that. I *know* I tested it and it worked. > >> In any case this is a trivial patch to add the functionality... > > Which I still think is broken and needlessly complicated. Please read my > first reply again. > Oops -- I completely missed the 2nd half of your reply. Sorry 'bout that. I'll do a v3 in a bit P. > Rasmus >
