On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:32:08 -0500 Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com> wrote:
> >> + > >> + if (strcmp(token, "__u64") == 0) { > >> + if (asprintf(&arg->atom.atom, "%zd", sizeof(__u64)) < 0) > >> + goto out_free_atom; > >> + } else if (strcmp(token, "__u32") == 0) { > >> + if (asprintf(&arg->atom.atom, "%zd", sizeof(__u32)) < 0) > >> + goto out_free_atom; > > > > What events are doing sizeof(__u64) and sizeof(__u32)? > > > > First, that's useless, as sizeof(__u64) will always be 8, and > > sizeof(__u32) will always be 4. > > > > What exactly is this fixing? > > It starts to fix things like: > > kmem:mm_page_alloc > Warning: [kmem:mm_page_alloc] function sizeof not defined I don't see any sizeof() calls in my format files. And still, its useless to add sizeof() for __u64 and __u32 unless perhaps a type is a macro defined to that. Ah, this is arm64 (as I don't see it in x86). No the real fix is to nuke the sizeof(__u64) in the TP_printk(), it's useless because it will always be 8. -- Steve > > or: > > # perf stat -e kvm:kvm_arm_set_regset -- true > Warning: [kvm:kvm_arm_set_regset] function sizeof not defined > Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0 > *** Error in `perf': double free or corruption (fasttop): > 0x00000000303f5930 *** > > There is a RH bug about it (and the "~" operator, which has been fixed) > here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298229 > > Thanks for taking a look at this,