On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Stephan Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, Herbert, > > Changes v2: use ktime_get_ns instead of ktime_get_raw_ns > > The testing was re-performed and indicate no difference to the previous > testing.
Thanks for following through on this. This version addresses my concerns about using specialized time accessors without clear rational. thanks -john
