On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 08:41:09PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > On 06/23/2016 08:28 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:26:52PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 03:40:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > In my opinion, we should treat the timeout value as relative for 
> > > > > FUTEX_WAIT
> > > > > regardless of the CLOCK used.
> > > > 
> > > > Which requires even more changes as you have to select which clock you 
> > > > are
> > > > using for adding the base time.
> > > 
> > > Right, something like the following?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> > > index 33664f7..c39d807 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/futex.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> > > @@ -3230,8 +3230,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, 
> > > op, u32, val,
> > >                   return -EINVAL;
> > > 
> > >           t = timespec_to_ktime(ts);
> > > -         if (cmd == FUTEX_WAIT)
> > > -                 t = ktime_add_safe(ktime_get(), t);
> > > +         if (cmd == FUTEX_WAIT) {
> > > +                 if (cmd & FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME)
> > > +                         t = ktime_add_safe(ktime_get_real(), t);
> > > +                 else
> > > +                         t = ktime_add_safe(ktime_get(), t);
> > > +         }
> > >           tp = &t;
> > >   }
> > >   /*
> > 
> > Just in the interests of readability/maintainability, might it not
> > make some sense to recode the timeout handling for FUTEX_WAIT
> > within futex_wait(). I think that part of the reason we're in this
> > mess of inconsistency is that timeout interpretation is being handled
> > at too many different points in the code.
> 
> 
> I agree, that is indeed why I missed it in my original patch.

Or perhaps in do_futex() which is where the majority of the argument
interpretation is done, and which already has a switch statement for all op
codes. Maybe something like this:


diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 33664f7..c666715 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ long do_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, ktime_t 
*timeout,
 {
        int cmd = op & FUTEX_CMD_MASK;
        unsigned int flags = 0;
+       ktime_t t;
 
        if (!(op & FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG))
                flags |= FLAGS_SHARED;
@@ -3181,6 +3182,18 @@ long do_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, 
ktime_t *timeout,
        switch (cmd) {
        case FUTEX_WAIT:
                val3 = FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY;
+               /*
+                * The user-facing FUTEX_WAIT op interface receives a relative
+                * timeout. The kernel-side futex_wait() function accepts an
+                * absolute timeout. Convert the relative timeout to absolute.
+                */
+               if (timeout) {
+                       if (op & FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME)
+                               t = ktime_add_safe(ktime_get_real(), *timeout);
+                       else
+                               t = ktime_add_safe(ktime_get(), *timeout);
+                       timeout = &t;
+               }
        case FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET:
                return futex_wait(uaddr, flags, val, timeout, val3);
        case FUTEX_WAKE:
@@ -3230,8 +3243,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, op, u32, 
val,
                        return -EINVAL;
 
                t = timespec_to_ktime(ts);
-               if (cmd == FUTEX_WAIT)
-                       t = ktime_add_safe(ktime_get(), t);
                tp = &t;
        }
        /*

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to