On 05/26/2016 08:22 AM, js1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>

Some of zone threshold depends on number of managed pages in the zone.
When memory is going on/offline, it can be changed and we need to
adjust them.

This patch add recalculation to appropriate places and clean-up
related function for better maintanance.

Can you be more specific about the user visible effect? Presumably it's not affecting just ZONE_CMA? I assume it's fixing the thresholds where only part of node is onlined or offlined? Or are they currently wrong even when whole node is onlined/offlined?

(Sorry but I can't really orient myself in the maze of memory hotplug :(

Thanks,
Vlastimil

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index d27e8b9..90e5a82 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4874,6 +4874,8 @@ int local_memory_node(int node)
 }
 #endif

+static void setup_min_unmapped_ratio(struct zone *zone);
+static void setup_min_slab_ratio(struct zone *zone);
 #else  /* CONFIG_NUMA */

 static void set_zonelist_order(void)
@@ -5988,9 +5990,8 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct 
pglist_data *pgdat)
                zone->managed_pages = is_highmem_idx(j) ? realsize : freesize;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
                zone->node = nid;
-               zone->min_unmapped_pages = (freesize*sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio)
-                                               / 100;
-               zone->min_slab_pages = (freesize * sysctl_min_slab_ratio) / 100;
+               setup_min_unmapped_ratio(zone);
+               setup_min_slab_ratio(zone);
 #endif
                zone->name = zone_names[j];
                spin_lock_init(&zone->lock);
@@ -6896,6 +6897,7 @@ int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void)
 {
        unsigned long lowmem_kbytes;
        int new_min_free_kbytes;
+       struct zone *zone;

        lowmem_kbytes = nr_free_buffer_pages() * (PAGE_SIZE >> 10);
        new_min_free_kbytes = int_sqrt(lowmem_kbytes * 16);
@@ -6913,6 +6915,14 @@ int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void)
        setup_per_zone_wmarks();
        refresh_zone_stat_thresholds();
        setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve();
+
+       for_each_zone(zone) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+               setup_min_unmapped_ratio(zone);
+               setup_min_slab_ratio(zone);
+#endif
+       }
+
        return 0;
 }
 core_initcall(init_per_zone_wmark_min)
@@ -6954,6 +6964,12 @@ int watermark_scale_factor_sysctl_handler(struct 
ctl_table *table, int write,
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+static void setup_min_unmapped_ratio(struct zone *zone)
+{
+       zone->min_unmapped_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
+                       sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio) / 100;
+}
+
 int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int 
write,
        void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
@@ -6965,11 +6981,17 @@ int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct 
ctl_table *table, int write,
                return rc;

        for_each_zone(zone)
-               zone->min_unmapped_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
-                               sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio) / 100;
+               setup_min_unmapped_ratio(zone);
+
        return 0;
 }

+static void setup_min_slab_ratio(struct zone *zone)
+{
+       zone->min_slab_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
+                       sysctl_min_slab_ratio) / 100;
+}
+
 int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
        void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
@@ -6981,8 +7003,8 @@ int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table 
*table, int write,
                return rc;

        for_each_zone(zone)
-               zone->min_slab_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
-                               sysctl_min_slab_ratio) / 100;
+               setup_min_slab_ratio(zone);
+
        return 0;
 }
 #endif


Reply via email to