On 27/06/2016 13:22, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 06/27/2016 01:57 PM, Nick Dyer wrote: > 2) Alternatively, if we want to keep using BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE, then: > > - we keep V4L2_CAP_TOUCH which is combined with CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE (and perhaps > VIDEO_OUTPUT in the future). The CAP_TOUCH just says that this is a touch > device, not a video device, but otherwise it acts the same. > > I'd go with 2, since I see no reason to add a new BUF_TYPE for this. > It acts exactly like video after all, with only a few restrictions (i.e. no > colorspace info or interlaced). And adding a new BUF_TYPE will likely break > the existing sur40 app.
OK, I will rework with this approach.
