On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:04:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > @@ -215,6 +219,11 @@ struct page {
> > #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> > int _last_cpupid;
> > #endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
> > + struct lockdep_map map;
> > + struct cross_lock xlock;
> > +#endif
> > }
>
> So that's 32+64=96 bytes (CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=n) added to struct page,
> really!?
Yes... I concerned it at first, but I thought it would be ok since
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGE is a debug feature. Anyway, I will try to reduce
the size of struct cross_lock which is only thing I can do to reduce
it, since we cannot avoid using lockdep_map if we want to make
lock_page() participate in the lockdep play.
