Hi, Rafael > From: rjwyso...@gmail.com [mailto:rjwyso...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Rafael J. Wysocki > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ACPI / debugger: Fix regressions that AML > debugger stops working > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > The FIFO unlocking mechanism in acpi_dbg has been messed up by the > > following commit: > > Commit: 287980e49ffc0f6d911601e7e352a812ed27768e > > Subject: remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses > > It converts !IS_ERR_VALUE(ret) into !ret. This patch fixes the > > regression. > > > > Fixes: 287980e49ffc ("remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses") > > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > OK, but -> > > > --- > > drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c > > index 1f41284..ebc8d18 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c > > @@ -602,7 +602,8 @@ static int acpi_aml_read_user(char __user *buf, > int len) > > crc->tail = (crc->tail + n) & (ACPI_AML_BUF_SIZE - 1); > > ret = n; > > out: > > - acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_OUT_USER, !ret); > > + acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_OUT_USER, > > + ret < 0 ? false : true); > > -> The ternary operation is not necessary here, because the result of > (ret < 0) is already boolean. So this can be written as > > acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_OUT_USER, ret >= 0); > > and analogously below. > > I've made that change, please check the result in bleeding-edge.
[Lv Zheng] Confirmed to be working. Thanks for the simplification. Thanks and best regards -Lv
