Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2016/7/8 11:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> Could you take a look at this in xfstests/generic/013?
>
> [ 502.480850] ======================================================
> [ 502.480864] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [ 502.480877] 4.7.0-rc1+ #124 Tainted: G OE
> [ 502.480886] -------------------------------------------------------
> [ 502.480897] fsstress/10729 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 502.480906] (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18){+.+.+.}, at:
> [<ffffffff81299c3b>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x1db/0x2310
> [ 502.480948]
> [ 502.480948] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 502.480959] (&fi->dio_rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffc081e2b1>]
> f2fs_direct_IO+0xd1/0x3d0 [f2fs]
> [ 502.481003]
> [ 502.481003] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [ 502.481003]
> [ 502.481018]
> [ 502.481018] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [ 502.481030]
> [ 502.481030] -> #1 (&fi->dio_rwsem){.+.+.+}:
> [ 502.481054] [<ffffffff810e51c3>] lock_acquire+0xd3/0x220
> [ 502.481071] [<ffffffff818d1921>] down_read+0x51/0xa0
> [ 502.481089] [<ffffffffc081e2b1>] f2fs_direct_IO+0xd1/0x3d0 [f2fs]
> [ 502.481114] [<ffffffff811c34c7>]
> generic_file_direct_write+0xa7/0x160
> [ 502.481133] [<ffffffff811c363d>]
> __generic_file_write_iter+0xbd/0x1e0
> [ 502.481149] [<ffffffffc080437b>] f2fs_file_write_iter+0xdb/0x100
> [f2fs]
> [ 502.481173] [<ffffffff81253a88>] __vfs_write+0xc8/0x140
> [ 502.481190] [<ffffffff81254c55>] vfs_write+0xb5/0x1b0
> [ 502.481205] [<ffffffff81255fe9>] SyS_write+0x49/0xa0
> [ 502.481220] [<ffffffff818d4100>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
> [ 502.481236]
> [ 502.481236] -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18){+.+.+.}:
> [ 502.481264] [<ffffffff810e481c>] __lock_acquire+0x161c/0x1940
> [ 502.481280] [<ffffffff810e51c3>] lock_acquire+0xd3/0x220
> [ 502.481296] [<ffffffff818d1b9a>] down_write+0x5a/0xc0
> [ 502.481312] [<ffffffff81299c3b>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x1db/0x2310
> [ 502.481328] [<ffffffff8129bdaa>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x3a/0x40
> [ 502.481344] [<ffffffffc081e2e4>] f2fs_direct_IO+0x104/0x3d0 [f2fs]
> [ 502.481368] [<ffffffff811c40a9>] generic_file_read_iter+0x689/0x7e0
> [ 502.481384] [<ffffffff812545d1>] __vfs_read+0xc1/0x130
> [ 502.481399] [<ffffffff81254af1>] vfs_read+0x91/0x140
> [ 502.481414] [<ffffffff81255f49>] SyS_read+0x49/0xa0
> [ 502.481429] [<ffffffff818d4100>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
> [ 502.481445]
> [ 502.481445] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 502.481445]
> [ 502.481459] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 502.481459]
> [ 502.481726] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 502.481987] ---- ----
> [ 502.482242] lock(&fi->dio_rwsem);
> [ 502.482501]
> lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18);
> [ 502.482765] lock(&fi->dio_rwsem);
> [ 502.483025] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18);
Seems we will suffer ABBA deadlock:
writer reader
- f2fs_file_write_iter
- down_write(&inode->i_rwsem)
- __generic_file_write_iter
- generic_file_direct_write
- f2fs_direct_IO
- generic_file_read_iter
- f2fs_direct_IO
- down_read(&fi->dio_rwsem)
- __blockdev_direct_IO
- do_blockdev_direct_IO
- down_write(&inode->i_rwsem)
- down_read(&fi->dio_rwsem)
What about splitting dio_rwsem to rdio_rwsem/wdio_rwsem for reader/writer to
avoid deadlock?
Thanks,
> [ 502.483285]
> [ 502.483285] *** DEADLOCK ***
> [ 502.483285]
> [ 502.484018] 1 lock held by fsstress/10729:
> [ 502.484262] #0: (&fi->dio_rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffc081e2b1>]
> f2fs_direct_IO+0xd1/0x3d0 [f2fs]
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:49:12PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
>>
>> Datas in file can be operated by GC and DIO simultaneously, so we will
>> face race case as below:
>>
>> For write case:
>> Thread A Thread B
>> - generic_file_direct_write
>> - invalidate_inode_pages2_range
>> - f2fs_direct_IO
>> - do_blockdev_direct_IO
>> - do_direct_IO
>> - get_more_blocks
>> - f2fs_gc
>> - do_garbage_collect
>> - gc_data_segment
>> - move_data_page
>> - do_write_data_page
>> migrate data block to new block
>> address
>> - dio_bio_submit
>> update user data to old block address
>>
>> For read case:
>> Thread A Thread B
>> - generic_file_direct_write
>> - invalidate_inode_pages2_range
>> - f2fs_direct_IO
>> - do_blockdev_direct_IO
>> - do_direct_IO
>> - get_more_blocks
>> - f2fs_balance_fs
>> - f2fs_gc
>> - do_garbage_collect
>> - gc_data_segment
>> - move_data_page
>> - do_write_data_page
>> migrate data block to new block
>> address
>> - write_checkpoint
>> - do_checkpoint
>> - clear_prefree_segments
>> - f2fs_issue_discard
>> discard old block adress
>> - dio_bio_submit
>> update user buffer from obsolete block address
>>
>> In order to fix this, for one file, we should let DIO and GC getting
>> exclusion
>> against with each other.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v3: use semaphore to avoid racing in between read dio and write dio.
>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 4 ++++
>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> index b6fd5bd..19197bb 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb,
>> struct iov_iter *iter)
>> {
>> struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
>> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
>> + struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
>> size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
>> loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
>> int err;
>> @@ -1727,7 +1728,10 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb,
>> struct iov_iter *iter)
>>
>> trace_f2fs_direct_IO_enter(inode, offset, count, iov_iter_rw(iter));
>>
>> + down_read(&fi->dio_rwsem);
>> err = blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, iter, get_data_block_dio);
>> + up_read(&fi->dio_rwsem);
>> +
>> if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
>> if (err > 0)
>> set_inode_flag(inode, FI_UPDATE_WRITE);
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index bf9a13a..2e439ec 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ struct f2fs_inode_info {
>> struct list_head inmem_pages; /* inmemory pages managed by f2fs */
>> struct mutex inmem_lock; /* lock for inmemory pages */
>> struct extent_tree *extent_tree; /* cached extent_tree entry */
>> + struct rw_semaphore dio_rwsem; /* avoid racing between dio and gc */
>> };
>>
>> static inline void get_extent_info(struct extent_info *ext,
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>> index c612137..a9bfb8d 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>> @@ -755,12 +755,25 @@ next_step:
>> /* phase 3 */
>> inode = find_gc_inode(gc_list, dni.ino);
>> if (inode) {
>> + struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
>> + bool locked = false;
>> +
>> + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + if (!down_write_trylock(&fi->dio_rwsem))
>> + continue;
>> + locked = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> start_bidx = start_bidx_of_node(nofs, inode)
>> + ofs_in_node;
>> if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(inode) &&
>> S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
>> move_encrypted_block(inode, start_bidx);
>> else
>> move_data_page(inode, start_bidx, gc_type);
>> +
>> + if (locked)
>> + up_write(&fi->dio_rwsem);
>> +
>> stat_inc_data_blk_count(sbi, 1, gc_type);
>> }
>> }
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> index edd1b35..dde57fb 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> @@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_alloc_inode(struct super_block
>> *sb)
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->gdirty_list);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->inmem_pages);
>> mutex_init(&fi->inmem_lock);
>> + init_rwsem(&fi->dio_rwsem);
>>
>> /* Will be used by directory only */
>> fi->i_dir_level = F2FS_SB(sb)->dir_level;
>> --
>> 2.7.2
