On 13/07/2016 12:02, Yang Zhang wrote:
> On 2016/7/13 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/07/2016 11:21, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +static int handle_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + WARN_ON(!(vcpu->arch.cr4 & X86_CR4_UMIP));
>>>
>>> I think WARN_ON is too heavy since a malicious guest may trigger it
>>> always.
>>
>> I missed this---how so? Setting the bit is under "if ((cr4 &
>> X86_CR4_UMIP) && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_UMIP))".
>
> Sorry, I consider it under my previous suggestion(setting it
> unconditionally). :(
No problem, thanks for your interest!
Paolo
