Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-07-13 03:32:42)
> On 07/04/2016 11:12 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> > 
> > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig:config ARCH_S5PV210
> > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig:  bool "Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110" if 
> > ARCH_MULTI_V7
> > 
> > ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> > 
> > Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> > when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
> > 
> > We explicitly disallow a driver unbind, since that doesn't have a
> > sensible use case anyway, and it allows us to drop the ".remove"
> > code for non-modular drivers.
> > 
> > Since this code is already not using module_init, case, the init
> > ordering remains unchanged with this commit.
> > 
> > We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tags etc. since all that information
> > is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
> > 
> > Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
> 
> In case this is going to be applied directly to current clk-next:
> 
> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <[email protected]>
> 

Applied to clk-next.

I know that we normally take PRs for the samsung clk stuff, but this
late in the cycle I'm OK to simply pick individual patches.

Thanks,
Mike

Reply via email to