On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 09:32:36PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 07:20:18PM -0700, Andrey Pronin wrote:
>
> > +static int cr50_spi_read16(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16
> > *result)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = data->phy_ops->read_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u16), (u8 *)result);
> > + if (!rc)
> > + *result = le16_to_cpu(*result);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> I thought we had core support for this pattern?
>
> Christophe ?
>
> Please change this so this code isn't duplicated.
>
> Jason
>
Hmm, didn't see the support. Would be great if there is.
The pattern itself is copied from tpm_tis_spi as is.
read_bytes/write_bytes were de-dup'ed as they used a lot of common code
(even more for this driver than for tpm_tis_spi).
But as for _readNN/_writeNN, there're only three of these functions,
so it din't seem too bad.
