On Tue 19-07-16 11:08:18, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page() can be called without page lock hold,
> so let's remove incorrect comment.
Could you explain why the page lock is not really needed, please? Or
what has changed that it is not needed anymore?
Thanks!
>
> Reported-by: Zhan Chen <zha...@andrew.cmu.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git v4.7-rc7/mm/hugetlb.c v4.7-rc7_patched/mm/hugetlb.c
> index c1f3c0b..26f735c 100644
> --- v4.7-rc7/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ v4.7-rc7_patched/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4401,7 +4401,6 @@ follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long
> address,
>
> /*
> * This function is called from memory failure code.
> - * Assume the caller holds page lock of the head page.
> */
> int dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page(struct page *hpage)
> {
> --
> 2.7.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majord...@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
