During unrelated work, attempting to remove an include of the
linux/module.h in favour of "struct module;" in order to reduce
header entanglement, we found doing so caused a build failure in
this file.
It turns out this file uses __init_or_module which lives in the
module.h header, but it wasn't including module.h -- which was
being masked by the module.h in include/linux/gpio/driver.h - the
one we want to remove/replace.
However, if we dig into Makefile / Kconfig we find:
mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.o ---->
mach-omap2/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_NOKIA_RX51) += board-rx51-peripherals.o
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig:config MACH_NOKIA_RX51
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig: bool "Nokia N900 (RX-51) phone"
...and hence the __init_or_module is pointless, as it will always
evaluate to plain __init.
With ARM and GPIO being different subsystems, we'll need to get
this in ARM 1st, and then wait a release before changing the GPIO
header, otherwise we'll risk triggering build failures.
Cc: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
Cc: Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
index a5ab712c1a59..4ddda1d33ec1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static struct twl4030_platform_data rx51_twldata __initdata
= {
.vio = &rx51_vio,
};
-static struct tpa6130a2_platform_data rx51_tpa6130a2_data __initdata_or_module
= {
+static struct tpa6130a2_platform_data rx51_tpa6130a2_data __initdata = {
.power_gpio = 98,
};
--
2.8.4
