there is an i missing in the Subject.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:44:18AM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> Replace clk_enable and clk_prepare with clk_enable_prepare and
> clk_disable and clk_unprepare with clk_disable_unprepare.
>
> The Coccinelle semantic patch used to make this change is as follows:
> @@
> expression e;
> @@
>
> - clk_prepare(e);
> - clk_enable(e);
> + clk_prepare_enable(e);
>
> @@
> expression e;
> @@
>
> - clk_disable(e);
> - clk_unprepare(e);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(e);
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1...@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -Rebased patch
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> index 43207f5..79bae48 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> @@ -910,10 +910,8 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pd)
> #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> /* Not all platforms have a clk */
> drv_data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pd->dev, NULL);
> - if (!IS_ERR(drv_data->clk)) {
> - clk_prepare(drv_data->clk);
> - clk_enable(drv_data->clk);
> - }
> + if (!IS_ERR(drv_data->clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(drv_data->clk);
When you touch this, better add error checking. I wonder why these
functions are not marked __must_check.
Also using IS_ERR(drv_data->clk) is wrong here, becauce devm_clk_get
might return -EPROBE_DEFER.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
