On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michal Marek <mma...@suse.cz> wrote: > Dne 14.6.2016 v 18:39 Kees Cook napsal(a): >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> >> wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek <mma...@suse.cz> wrote: >>>> >>>> I won't :). Kees, are you going to keep the patch in your tree and send >>>> it to Linus once kbuild is in? Or shall I take it (which would >>>> temporarily result in another duplication...). >>> >>> Or Kees could send you a pull request ... >> >> My head hurts. :) How about this: since a pull request would (I think) >> end up pulling the other unrelated kspp patches, how about you take >> the patch into kbuild, and once it's there, I'll just remove it from >> my tree (since it's on top). > > Sorry, I forgot about this one. It's cherry-picked onto my kbuild branch > now.
Okay, no worries. I've removed it from my tree and merged your kbuild/for-next branch into my for-next/kspp branch. Let me know once you've sent the kbuild/for-next pull request, and I can follow it up with the the entropy plugin pull request. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Brillo & Chrome OS Security
