i am sorry, the second patch is only a test patch, please don't apply it
i will send another mail for correct this

On 08/02/2016 01:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi zijun_hu,
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.7 next-20160801]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to 
> help improve the system]
> 
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/zijun_hu/mm-memblock-c-fix-NULL-dereference-error/20160802-130708
> base:   git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master
> config: i386-randconfig-x009-201631 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=i386 
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
>                     from mm/memblock.c:13:
>    mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_patch_verify':
>>> mm/memblock.c:1713:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 
>>> 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka 
>>> unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>               ^
>    include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
>     #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>                         ^~~
>>> mm/memblock.c:1713:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>       ^~~~~~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1713:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 
> 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned 
> int}' [-Wformat=]
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>               ^
>    include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
>     #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>                         ^~~
>>> mm/memblock.c:1713:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>       ^~~~~~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1719:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 
> 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned 
> int}' [-Wformat=]
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>               ^
>    include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
>     #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>                         ^~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1719:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>       ^~~~~~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1719:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 
> 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned 
> int}' [-Wformat=]
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>               ^
>    include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
>     #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>                         ^~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1719:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>       ^~~~~~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1726:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 
> 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned 
> int}' [-Wformat=]
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>               ^
>    include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
>     #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>                         ^~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1726:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>       ^~~~~~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1726:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 
> 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned 
> int}' [-Wformat=]
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>               ^
>    include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
>     #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>                         ^~~
>    mm/memblock.c:1726:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
>       pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>       ^~~~~~~
> 
> vim +1713 mm/memblock.c
> 
>   1697                pr_info(" memory size = %#llx reserved size = %#llx\n",
>   1698                        (unsigned long long)memblock.memory.total_size,
>   1699                        (unsigned long 
> long)memblock.reserved.total_size);
>   1700        
>   1701                memblock_dump(&memblock.memory, "memory");
>   1702                memblock_dump(&memblock.reserved, "reserved");
>   1703        }
>   1704        
>   1705        void __init_memblock memblock_patch_verify(void)
>   1706        {
>   1707                u64 i;
>   1708                phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
>   1709        
>   1710                pr_info("in %s: memory\n", __func__);
>   1711                for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, NULL, 
> NUMA_NO_NODE,
>   1712                                MEMBLOCK_NONE, &this_start, &this_end, 
> NULL)
>> 1713                 pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>   1714                                        i, this_start, this_end);
>   1715        
>   1716                pr_info("in %s: reserved\n", __func__);
>   1717                for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.reserved, NULL, 
> NUMA_NO_NODE,
>   1718                                MEMBLOCK_NONE, &this_start, &this_end, 
> NULL)
>   1719                        pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>   1720                                        i, this_start, this_end);
>   1721        
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
> 

Reply via email to