Hi Richard.
I'm _very_ keen to try this (my Alpha won't boot 2.4 at the mo), however I
think the attachments faery has been playing tricks again.
Do you have a patch relative to 2.4.0-test10?
Sean
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:39:31AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> [ For l-k, the issue is that pci-pci bridges and the devices behind
> them are not initialized properly. There are a number of Alphas
> whose built-in scsi controlers are behind such a bridge preventing
> these machines from booting at all. Ivan provided an initial
> patch to solve this issue. ]
>
> I've not gotten a chance to try this on the rawhide yet,
> but I did give it a whirl on my up1000, which does have
> an agp bridge that acts like a pci bridge.
>
> Notable changes from your patch:
>
> * Use kmalloc, not vmalloc. (ouch!)
> * Replace cropped found_vga detection code.
> * Handle bridges with empty I/O (or MEM) ranges.
> * Collect the proper width of the bus range.
>
>
> r~
Content-Description: diff vs bridges-2.4.0t10
> diff -rup linux/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c 2.4.0-11-1/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> --- linux/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c Wed Nov 8 01:24:16 2000
> +++ 2.4.0-11-1/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c Wed Nov 8 01:04:17 2000
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> -#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>
>
> #define DEBUG_CONFIG 1
> @@ -56,31 +56,50 @@ pbus_assign_resources_sorted(struct pci_
> mem_reserved += 32*1024*1024;
> continue;
> }
> +
> + if (dev->class >> 8 == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
> + found_vga = 1;
> +
> pdev_sort_resources(dev, &head_io, IORESOURCE_IO);
> pdev_sort_resources(dev, &head_mem, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> }
> +
> for (list = head_io.next; list;) {
> res = list->res;
> idx = res - &list->dev->resource[0];
> - if (pci_assign_resource(list->dev, idx) == 0)
> + if (pci_assign_resource(list->dev, idx) == 0
> + && ranges->io_end < res->end)
> ranges->io_end = res->end;
> tmp = list;
> list = list->next;
> - vfree(tmp);
> + kfree(tmp);
> }
> for (list = head_mem.next; list;) {
> res = list->res;
> idx = res - &list->dev->resource[0];
> - if (pci_assign_resource(list->dev, idx) == 0)
> + if (pci_assign_resource(list->dev, idx) == 0
> + && ranges->mem_end < res->end)
> ranges->mem_end = res->end;
> tmp = list;
> list = list->next;
> - vfree(tmp);
> + kfree(tmp);
> }
> +
> ranges->io_end += io_reserved;
> ranges->mem_end += mem_reserved;
> +
> + /* ??? How to turn off a bus from responding to, say, I/O at
> + all if there are no I/O ports behind the bus? Turning off
> + PCI_COMMAND_IO doesn't seem to do the job. So we must
> + allow for at least one unit. */
> + if (ranges->io_end == ranges->io_start)
> + ranges->io_end += 1;
> + if (ranges->mem_end == ranges->mem_start)
> + ranges->mem_end += 1;
> +
> ranges->io_end = ROUND_UP(ranges->io_end, 4*1024);
> ranges->mem_end = ROUND_UP(ranges->mem_end, 1024*1024);
> +
> return found_vga;
> }
>
> diff -rup linux/drivers/pci/setup-res.c 2.4.0-11-1/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> --- linux/drivers/pci/setup-res.c Wed Nov 8 01:24:16 2000
> +++ 2.4.0-11-1/drivers/pci/setup-res.c Wed Nov 8 00:21:13 2000
> @@ -22,10 +22,10 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> -#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>
>
> -#define DEBUG_CONFIG 0
> +#define DEBUG_CONFIG 1
> #if DEBUG_CONFIG
> # define DBGC(args) printk args
> #else
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev,
> if (ln)
> size = ln->res->end - ln->res->start;
> if (r->end - r->start > size) {
> - tmp = vmalloc(sizeof(*tmp));
> + tmp = kmalloc(sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
> tmp->next = ln;
> tmp->res = r;
> tmp->dev = dev;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
