> I'm unsure if you're not re-submitting because you're waiting for an
> answer for me or not.

I found your five commits (on 2016-06-29) for this patch series
sufficient in principle.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=d313cdde71ec9a5c327a515c37a0dca2cca00de5


> If you are, here it is.  And, don't do that. :)

I find this feedback a bit strange.


> Please submit your patch-set *not* connected to this, now very
> tangled web of submissions, complete with all the Acks you've
> accrued.

I would find it nice if another one of my update suggestions
could be integrated after a bit of feedback evolved for a special
source code search pattern.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9199519/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9208925/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9210291/

It seems to be harder to achieve acceptance similar to the others.

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to