Yes, sorry about it,I am too hasty

B.R.

Jia He

On 8/8/16 7:12 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
Jia He <hejia...@gmail.com> wrote:
buff[] will be assigned later, so memset is not necessary.

Signed-off-by: Jia He <hejia...@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuz...@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: James Morris <jmor...@namei.org>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshf...@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <ka...@trash.net>
---
  net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index ab3e796..43fa8d0 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4967,7 +4967,6 @@ static inline void __snmp6_fill_stats64(u64 *stats, void 
__percpu *mib,
BUG_ON(pad < 0); - memset(buff, 0, sizeof(buff));
        buff[0] = IPSTATS_MIB_MAX;
for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
                 for (i = 1; i < IPSTATS_MIB_MAX; i++)
                         buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64(mib, c, i, syncpoff);

Without memset result of buff[i] += ... is undefined.


Reply via email to