Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> What experimental evidence did you have? 
>
> But I'm tempted to drop this unless the hotplug mystery can be cleared
> up. There was past information that logical is unsafe for hotplug.

Basically as I commented in genapic_flat, that at least on hyperthreading
cpus the destination mask is not always honored, and so if you only
allow one hyperthread I have seen the irq show up on the other hyperthread.

Now if the cpu is actually disabled I don't think that is a problem, but
I know early versions of hotplug did actually disable the cpu.

I think the renaming in this patch makes things clearer in a useful way.


The more I look at the hotplug cpu code the more I think it should be
filed under EXPERIMENTAL (as in the code is buggy and not ready for
production use yet).

Trying to see if I can improve the irq migration mess I stumbled upon
the following.  Currently set_affinity needs to be called with
irq_desc[irq].lock held.  It needs to be called from interrupt context.
And 1 millisecond delay appears utterly bogus, although the enable
the irqs do something disable the irqs likely flushes pending irqs.
A problem that cannot occurs differently if the irqs are migrated
from interrupt context.

Looking further this buggy set_affinity usage also appears in
setup_ioapic_dest.  Although it is much less dangerous there,
as the code is largely a noop.

Is it just me or are we crazy for support software controlled irq
migration?

void fixup_irqs(cpumask_t map)
{
        unsigned int irq;
        static int warned;

        for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQS; irq++) {
                cpumask_t mask;
                if (irq == 2)
                        continue;

                cpus_and(mask, irq_desc[irq].affinity, map);
                if (any_online_cpu(mask) == NR_CPUS) {
                        printk("Breaking affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
                        mask = map;
                }
                if (irq_desc[irq].chip->set_affinity)
                        irq_desc[irq].chip->set_affinity(irq, mask);
                else if (irq_desc[irq].action && !(warned++))
                        printk("Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
        }

        /* That doesn't seem sufficient.  Give it 1ms. */
        local_irq_enable();
        mdelay(1);
        local_irq_disable();
}

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to