On Wednesday 10 August 2016 01:56 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:42:01PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 10 August 2016 01:37 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:32:03PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 10 August 2016 01:18 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 09 August 2016 10:45 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>>>>> Currently the davinci da8xx boards use the mach-davinci aemif code.
>>>>>> Instantiating an aemif node into the DT allows to use the ti-aemif
>>>>>> memory driver and is another step to better DT support.
>>>>>> Also it will allow to properly pass the emif timings via DT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan <kbel...@baylibre.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>>> index bc10e7e..f62928c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -411,6 +411,16 @@
>>>>>> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> + aemif: aemif@68000000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "ti,da850-aemif";
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + reg = <0x68000000 0x00008000>;
>>>>>> + ranges = <0 0 0x60000000 0x08000000
>>>>>> + 1 0 0x68000000 0x00008000>;
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> nand_cs3@62000000 {
>>>>>> compatible = "ti,davinci-nand";
>>>>>> reg = <0x62000000 0x807ff
>>>>>
>>>>> The nand node should be part of aemif node like it is done for keystone
>>>>> boards.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, can you move the nand node out of da850.dtsi completely. Its
>>>> much better to keep da850.dtsi restricted to soc-internal devices and
>>>> keep the board level devices like NAND flash in <board>.dts file.
>>>>
>>>> Similarly, can you move the NAND pinmux definitions too to the
>>>> da850-evm.dts file?
>>>>
>>>> There is advantage in keeping common pinmux definitions in da850.dtsi so
>>>> each board doe not have to repeat them. But AEMIF is an exception as its
>>>> usage can really be varied (NAND, NOR, SRAM, other). Plus, different
>>>> boards are likely to use different chip selects so coming up with some
>>>> pinmux definitions which will be reused widely is really unlikely.
>>>>
>>> This is exactly what I just did for the LCDK.
>>> If everybody is happy with it I will do the same for the evm as I put it
>>> in the cover letter.
>>
>> Yes please. We dont want duplication of data between da850.dtsi and
>> da850-lcdk.dts files.
>>
> Then I'll wait for this series to be applied and then apply my changes
> to the EVM while retiring the nand_cs3 together.
No, I prefer the fixup happens first. In the same series, you can first
fixup existing EVM and then add LCDK support.
Regards,
Sekhar
